@ Ultra- "If you are a man of honor, not only would you apologize for the false FoC accusation"
First off, you don't know me (I have however, read your posts ad naseum here and elsewhere and seen your videos) so If you want to question MY integrity and throw down that gauntlet, feel free to pm me and I'll be happy to provide you my # to discuss the matter in real time.
Even a child is known by his doings and on a forum a person is known by his posts. If I am getting a misrepresentation of your honor, I am not to blame for that and am certainly not alone. If you cannot seem to express yourself on a forum in a manner that accurately reflects your character, perhaps a new past-time is in order?
Second, show me where that feature is mentioned, referenced, or demonstrated with regard to any of your products prior this year(as opposed to another well known manufacturer). Just because you now posses the technical ability to reproduce it, and have received a ™ for it, doesn't lend any legitimacy to it. You can't buy a Big Mac at Burger King, but they are both delicious in their own right
Feel free to prove me wrong and I will happily fade away (and bolster your standing in the community).
This is called "moving the goal post". The original claims by Plecter were:
1. He owns the trademark to Flash on Clash - I proved this to be false.
2. Plecter coined the term Flash on Clash - again, I proved this to be false.
3. I am infringing on his trademark - Since #1 is false, so then is this claim.
4. I "stole" the term from Plecter - Since I have proven he didn't coin the phrase or own the trademark, this also is false.
I have proven unequivocally that his claims are false, which means you should apologize and move on. You seem to reject this argument in its entirety, which shows me that you have little interest in the actual facts of Plecter's claim. I am convinced that no matter what I say, you will fabricate a new standard of proof for me to meet. That is called moving the goal post and is the tactic of a dishonorable man.
Remember, I didn't go to Plecter and try to force him to stop using the term. I was just minding my own business and then he sent an email to me and tried to force me to change the name of my feature under the false pre-tense that he owned the trademark. Trying to coerce a competing company with a false trademark claim is illegal. The only thing keeping Plecter safe from the consequences of his illegal actions is the fact that he is in France.
As for you, I can easily meet this new goal post, and if your concern was genuine, you could find such evidence yourself on Google. The US Patent and Trademark Office also requires evidence of first use, which I can easily provide them as well. I even have a physical flyer created YEARS ago for distribution at Comic-Con that advertises "Flash on Clash" as an available feature of an Ultra Saber. Evidence can easily be provided to meet your challenge, but will this really satisfy you or will you simply move the goal post again? Would you accept this evidence, or simply reject it? You have not shown yourself to be a person with an open mind, but rather, a demagogue with a personal axe to grind.
Now let the "we love US" posts commence......
Do you really think mocking the community is going to win over anyone?
